Case study · Google Ads · Furniture outlet

The Dump cut weekly ad spend 68% and still drove 46x return

The Dump runs furniture outlet stores in seven markets, and most sales happen in a showroom. Woods Marketing built a weekly scorecard that compares every market and campaign on conversion value, store visits and cost, then moves budget away from what only buys attention and toward what brings people through the door.

ClientThe Dump Furniture Outlet + HaynesMarketsAtlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Norfolk, Richmond, TempeChannelsSearch, Performance Max, YouTubePeriodMar – Oct 2026
The results
46.0x
return on ad spend
up from 26.0x
$26.51
ad cost per store visit
down from $42.78
$4.94
cost per conversion
down from $7.91
1,231
store visits in one week
on $32,632

Compares the weeks of May 25–31 and Sep 28 – Oct 4, 2026, from the weekly scorecard. Conversion value and store visits as reported by Google Ads.

The starting point

Lots of reach, not enough visits

In March, six YouTube campaigns spent $25,618 in a single week and earned 3.7 million impressions and a 16.6% interaction rate. They also drove just 12 store visits, a 0.14x true return.

Brand search told the opposite story: seven campaigns returned 7.68x on $9,917. The plan was to measure every market the same way each week and let store visits decide where money went.

Before and after

Less spend, more return

May 25–31, 2026Sep 28 – Oct 4, 2026

Weekly ad spend

All campaigns, all markets
Before$102,388
After$32,632 (−68%)

Return on ad spend

Conversion value divided by cost
Before26.0x
After46.0x

Cost per store visit

Ad cost divided by store visits, lower is better
Before$42.78
After$26.51 (−38%)

Cost per conversion

All conversions, lower is better
Before$7.91
After$4.94 (−38%)

Return by market

Week of Sep 28 – Oct 4, 2026
MarketSpendConversion valueROASStore visits
Chicago$4,759$362,89576.3x298
Haynes / Norfolk$8,418$525,97862.5x293
Dallas$5,537$282,87151.1x219
Atlanta$4,535$224,16949.4x187
Tempe$4,608$56,87612.3x143
Houston$4,774$49,08610.3x90
What we did

One scorecard, every Monday

01

Scored every market on the same five numbers

Conversion value, cost, cost per conversion, store visits and phone calls, with a written biggest win, biggest worry and recommendation each week.

02

Moved budget out of reach-only video

YouTube’s engagement looked great, but 12 store visits on $25,618 couldn’t justify the spend. Budget shifted to Performance Max and search, where visits were measurable.

03

Protected branded search and trimmed broad terms

Branded campaigns kept their impression share while non-branded search was cut back to the keywords that converted.

04

Flagged problems the same week

The scorecard caught a paused Norfolk search campaign in May and a $4.67M phantom conversion value in Norfolk in August, so decisions weren’t made on bad data.

Lesson

Engagement isn’t a visit

YouTube’s 48.5% interaction rate in Dallas came with only 4 store visits. For store-based retail, judge every channel on visits.

Efficiency

Cut spend without cutting results

Weekly spend fell 68% while return rose from 26.0x to 46.0x.

Next

Fix the soft markets

Houston and Tempe trail at 10–12x. They’re the next focus for keyword, landing page and Performance Max work.

Source: The Dump/Haynes weekly scorecards for May 25–31 and Sep 28 – Oct 4, 2026; YouTube and brand search executive briefs for March 9–15, 2026; Dallas YouTube brief for March 10–23, 2026; Aug 24–30 scorecard notes. Conversion value includes store visit and in-store conversions as reported by Google Ads.

Want results like these?

Tell us what you’re running now and where you want to grow. We’ll set up a call, audit your marketing for free and show you exactly what we’d do next.